- About
- Events
- Events
- Calendar
- Graduation Information
- Cornell Learning Machines Seminar
- Student Colloquium
- BOOM
- Spring 2025 Colloquium
- Conway-Walker Lecture Series
- Salton 2024 Lecture Series
- Seminars / Lectures
- Big Red Hacks
- Cornell University / Cornell Tech - High School Programming Workshop and Contest 2025
- Game Design Initiative
- CSMore: The Rising Sophomore Summer Program in Computer Science
- Explore CS Research
- ACSU Research Night
- Cornell Junior Theorists' Workshop 2024
- People
- Courses
- Research
- Undergraduate
- M Eng
- MS
- PhD
- PhD
- Admissions
- Current Students
- Computer Science Graduate Office Hours
- Advising Guide for Research Students
- Business Card Policy
- Cornell Tech
- Curricular Practical Training
- A & B Exam Scheduling Guidelines
- Fellowship Opportunities
- Field of Computer Science Ph.D. Student Handbook
- Graduate TA Handbook
- Field A Exam Summary Form
- Graduate School Forms
- Instructor / TA Application
- Ph.D. Requirements
- Ph.D. Student Financial Support
- Special Committee Selection
- Travel Funding Opportunities
- Travel Reimbursement Guide
- The Outside Minor Requirement
- Robotics Ph. D. prgram
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Graduation Information
- CS Graduate Minor
- Outreach Opportunities
- Parental Accommodation Policy
- Special Masters
- Student Spotlights
- Contact PhD Office
Title: Statistical Inference Under Local Information Constraints
Abstract: We start by asking the following puzzle. Independent samples from an unknown distribution p on {1, …, k} are distributed across n players, with each player holding one sample. Each player can communicate L bits to a central referee, who wants to simulate a sample from p. When L= log k, one player suffices, since they can send their sample to the referee. How many players are needed to enable simulation if each player can only send L<log k bits?
The question above will be motivated as a path to solve distributed inference problems under communication constraints. We will consider two prototypical inference questions, distribution learning and identity testing. We will consider and discuss the power of shared/public randomness in distributed inference, and show that for identity testing, schemes without public randomness can be dramatically less efficient than those with. Finally, we show that our framework is general enough to be extended to other distributed settings, in particular to local differential privacy.
Based on joint works with Clement Canonne, Cody Freitag, and Himanshu Tyagi.