
Assignment 1
Team Workflow
Due: Saturday, January 25th at 11:59 pm
The team workflow is a document that outlines team roles. It also gives us
information about organizational issues, like team meeting times. This
helps us send course staff
to aid you and helps us to follow your progress.
The main purpose of this document is to give you some rules to fall back on should
everything fall apart. As a general rule, groups work pretty well in this course.
However, any good working group will have some measurements in place if something goes
awry.
Team Folders
All written work will live in the team’s Google Drive. This includes slides and deck docs,
too. It is expected that all students will write, edit, and present equally. Before anyone
starts writing, review the writing guidelines . Everyone is expected to know and follow
them from the first day. In creating your Google drive, your should do the following:
- Name the drive 3152sp2020_groupno (example: 3152sp2020_04 or 3152sp2020_12).
- Invite all team members to the folder
- Invite Dr. Nathans-Kelly (tracink.cornell@gmail.com), and Dr. White (wmw2@cornell.edu).
Document Format
The team workflow should be the first document created in your Google Drive. Format the
workflow as a memo. Memo formats are popular in industry, and you can find templates online.
Most importantly, a memo has a date, so you can change the date whenever the workflow
document must be changed.
Note: It is very important that your entire team agrees to the document before you submit.
Reread it carefully before submitting it. One of the first things that we want in the document
is an affirmation that everyone has read the document and agrees with it.
We have included a sample document for you so that everyone
can see what we are looking for. This memo is annotated to show off the important parts.
Your memo should start with the following header:
To: Course staff, and from the entire group
From: Include both your group name, number, and the names of everyone on the team
Re: Team name and number and "Workflow"
Date: Whenever you finalized the most recent version of the workflow
After this header, you break your document into several sections.
Section 1: Preamble
In conversation, each member should discuss with the team that grade each person desires.
This makes sure that everyone understands the commitment level from each team member.
This should not be reported to the instructors. However, the workflow document should
state that this has been discussed and understood by all in this preamble section.
The second item for the preamble is a statement that everyone on the team has read and
understood the writing guidelines for the class and will apply them to all communication
pieces for the course.
Section 2: Team Roles
The first major section of the document should list all of the team members and their
roles. For each team member we want the following:
- The member's preferred name
- The member's preferred contact e-mail
- The member's role on the team
- A short, positive-sounding paragraph on the member's skills
- A bullet-point list of the member's duties (which may change over the semester)
You can see how we formatted this in the sample document.
The sample we have provided does not include a Task Table, but your team will be asked to
provide one. Read on for more information.
For the list of bullet points, please pay attention to the
writing guidelines for
the course. We will reject extremely disorganized workflow documents.
Note: It is usual business practice to use people’s LAST NAMES in documentation,
out of both tradition and respect. Please follow that protocol.
Team must determine at least three roles on the team:
- Project Lead
-
This person is in charge of assigning tasks and keeping the team on top of deadlines.
They are also responsible for gathering together the information for the bi-weekly
reports (though everyone is expected to contribute). This should be someone who can
get along with everyone on the team.
- Software Lead
-
This person is in charge of the architecture decisions on the project. They lead
the design of the architecture specification and have final say on all class
interfaces. They also assign programming tasks to the other members of the team.
This should not be the same person as the Project Leader.
- Design Lead
-
In the case of multiple designers, this is the person who sets the visual aesthetic
of the game. They have final say on the artistic style of the game, and the other
designers are expected to conform to this style.
Other roles that the team wishes to use are allowed, such as Audio Lead or Junior Programmer. No matter what the roles
are, all students will present, write, and edit equally during the term.
This early, teams might not be sure about all of the responsibilities that everyone should have. The
sample workflow document reads like one that has been written half-way through the course,
once everyone has figured out the best way that they can serve the team. This is okay;
teams are allowed (and expected) to make changes to the document later on. Right now, just
make a good-faith attempt to assign roles to everyone on the team. It is okay if someone
has a single responsibility like "Will complete any programming task assigned each week."
Section 3: Team Coordination
Provide information about how the team is going to
coordinate its actions all semester long. While you may think of other things that
to specify, we expect the following information at a minimum.
Meeting Time/s
Your team is expected to have at least one official meeting one hour a week. These are
the team's offical office hours; we will come to you instead of you coming to us when teams request help. For that reason,
we need both the time and the location so that we can find you, if necessary. We prefer
prefer times before 8pm, close to central campus.
If you are going to meet more than once a week that is okay. Please add this to the
documentation as well. However, you should only write down the times for regular weekly
meetings. Do not include ad-hoc meetings.
Understand that all meetings should be during a reasonable hour, in a safe, public/campus space, with campus transportation available.
Minutes
During the official meetings, someone needs to write down what was discussed at the
meeting and what (general) tasks were assigned to each person. All meeting minutes
should be compiled into an ever-growing Google Doc in the Drive. Share turns taking meeting notes.
Communication
Tell us what you plan to use as your main mode of group communication. E-mail? Slack?
Google Hangout? Something else?
More importantly, what is the expected etiquette for this communication?
For example, in the sample workflow document, we spell
out some basic rules for using e-mail. We specify whether everyone is expected to respond,
and when they must respond by. This gives us an official way to determine when someone has
"stopped communicating" with the rest of the group and should be reported to the
instructors.
File Sharing
For code, everyone is expected to use GitHub to manage source code this semester. If you do not
have a GitHub repository, we will assign you one. However, GitHub is not ideal for the
artists and designers. If they are going to use something else (e.g. DropBox, Google Drive),
tell us here.
For all documents and slides, it will be assumed that Google Drive/Suite will be your
working platform.
Task Table
Create a similar version of this table. Fill
in the last three columns (Writing Leaders, Editors, and Rewrite Leads) with specific people,
taking care to rotate responsibilities equally. If this changes during the semester, update
the Workflow document. This task table will be checked by the instructors all semester
to sync up with documents, talks, writing, editing, etc. It will be compared to the work
shown in Google Drive and GitHub.
Section 4: Conflict Resolution
The last section is where you spell out how you will deal with conflicts in the group.
If you are unsure of what to write here, we strongly recommend that you contact
Traci Nathans-Kelly, as she has
experience with this particular issue. Historically, there are two types of conflicts
in this course. There are creative conflicts, where team members cannot agree how the
game should be designed. There are also problems when a team member misses a deadline
or cannot complete the tasks assigned.
Creative Conflicts
In dealing with creative conflicts, there are two popular choices. One is to assign
each team member "ownership" of a specific part of the game, and give that person final
say for any decisions that have to do with that part. This is what we have done in
the sample workflow document. This choice makes decision
making very efficient. However, it can make it so that other team members feel like they
do not have a real voice in the game design.
The other option is to go full democratic and vote on decisions. This is fine, but if
the team does this, the workflow document must spell out the rules for putting
something up for a vote, for counting the votes, and for recording the votes. We
find that the groups that run into trouble are always those that take a democratic
approach but do not have established rules for voting.
Actionable Consequences to Participation
Missed deadlines are very serious. If someone on the group is regularly missing
deadlines without an excuse, we want to hear about it in the two-week reports and in the
CATME surveys. This is exactly the information that we will use to adjust individual
grades at the end of the semester.
However, we find that unless there is some immediate consequence, the team member
is unlikely to improve in the future. The individual grade is not assigned until
the end of the semester, and the two-week reports can feel very abstract. That is
why the example in the sample document includes a
rule for treating the rest of the team to CTB as a consequence for missing meetings.
For minor problems, teams might find that a minor consequence is enough to resent
behaviors and that you do not need to report the issue in the two-week reports.
Teams are also heavily advised to outline consequences for missed course deadlines,
which are more serious than internal deadlines. For any consequences described, a
solution is NOT "and we will contact the instructors," which is too vague. Of course,
contacting the instructors is welcomed, but that consequence needs to be very specific
in how it plays out.
Example: "If a member misses input for a course deadline, the
project leader will collect evidence from our Slack Channel, our emails, and our GitHub.
Those items will be packaged for the instructor and sent as a PDF, along with a
recommendation that the person should receive a 15 point deduction for that major deadline."
On a brighter note, each team should also outline the ways in which they can acknowledge
when a contributor goes above and beyond the call of duty.
Submission
Due: Saturday, January 25th at 11:59 pm
You should submit a PDF file called workflow.pdf
containing all of the information above. We ask that the file be a PDF so that we can
annotate should we need to return it to you for revision.
In the case of later documents like the concept document,
teams will resubmit the document multiple times (with the final submission
part of the Final Document Portfolio). For this workflow document, we only ask that you
submit it once and revisit it often in Google Drive. If we think that it requires revision,
we will let you know. Later in the term, we will have other documents (Milestones and
2-week reports) that will impact the Team Workflow document.
However, you will probably find that you need to revise your workflow as the semester goes
on. Someone might need to gain new responsibilities, or shift current responsibilities
to another team member. You might need to change the Software Lead. You might need to
change your rules for handling conflicts. At the end of each two-week report, you will
be asked if you have made any changes to your workflow. If so, you will resubmit this
memo with the changes and the date that they take effect.
|